Investors are sending a strong warning to firms pursuing strategies to block environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposals as the SEC steps back from its traditional mediating role in such disputes. The agency’s November 17 decision to stop advising companies on whether to bar shareholder proposals in most cases has been criticized as a setback for shareholder rights and for the orderly engagement process long relied upon by investors.
Investors condemned the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Nov. 17 decision to stop advising companies on whether they can bar shareholder proposals in most cases. The move under first-year SEC Chairman Paul Atkins is a blow to shareholder rights and the gutting of a well-trodden, orderly process that investors have long relied on to engage with companies on touchy subjects.
Both sides face uncertainty. Companies will navigate uncharted territory without the SEC’s guidance, while investors worry that essential checks and balances on corporate behavior could be weakened, especially on contentious issues such as climate change, governance, and social responsibility.
Bloomberg Law’s coverage notes that the shift places companies in a new regulatory environment and could alter how governance discussions unfold, potentially changing the dynamics of future shareholder activism and engagement.
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis. Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
Author’s summary: The SEC’s move to curtail guidance on blocking shareholder proposals signals a notable pivot in corporate governance dynamics, potentially diminishing formal avenues for investor input while prompting greater scrutiny from stakeholders and regulators.