David Kampf's Contract Situation
Can anyone really fault David Kampf for signing a four-year contract worth an average of $2.4 million per season to play hockey? It seems quite reasonable given the circumstances.
Limited No-Trade Clause
Is it somehow David Kampf’s fault that he also secured a limited no-trade clause as part of the deal? This addition offers him some protection and flexibility in his career decisions.
Future Outlook
At this point, Kampf likely needs to accept that his options may be limited to staying with the Marlies or not playing elsewhere.
"Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four year deal that will see him on average earn $2.4M a season to play hockey?"
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
Author's summary: David Kampf's contract reflects a fair opportunity, and his limited no-trade clause ensures some leverage, suggesting his likely path is with the Marlies or no alternative.