The International Cricket Council (ICC) has ruled that the Ram Temple case is not a matter of law, but a matter of faith. The ruling has been made by the ICC's Dispute Resolution Committee, which has ordered the case to be heard by a panel of judges.
The case dates back to 2017, when the Indian government decided to build a temple in Ayodhya, a city in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The temple was to be built on a site that was previously occupied by a mosque, which was demolished by Hindu nationalists in 1992.
The case has been a contentious one, with many Muslims and Muslims organizations opposing the construction of the temple. They argue that the site is a sacred place for Muslims and that the temple would be a desecration of the site.
However, the Indian government has maintained that the site is a sacred place for Hindus and that the temple would be a way of honoring the deity Ram. The government has also argued that the site was never a mosque, but a temple that was destroyed by Muslim invaders in the 16th century.
The ICC's ruling has been welcomed by the Indian government, which has said that it is a major victory for Hindu rights. However, Muslim organizations have condemned the ruling, saying that it is a setback for Muslim rights.
The case is now set to be heard by a panel of judges, who will decide whether the temple can be built on the site. The ruling is expected to have a major impact on the country's politics, with many seeing it as a victory for Hindu nationalism.
Quote from the ICC's ruling:
"The site is a sacred place for Hindus and the temple would be a way of honoring the deity Ram. The site was never a mosque, but a temple that was destroyed by Muslim invaders in the 16th century."
Author's summary: The ICC's ruling on the Ram Temple case has sparked controversy in India, with many Muslims opposing the construction of the temple on a site that is considered sacred by Muslims. The ruling has been welcomed by the Indian government, which sees it as a major victory for Hindu rights. However, Muslim organizations have condemned the ruling, saying that it is a setback for Muslim rights.